Eh, bella domanda... devi scegliere ciò che può portare benefici alla tua carriera in futuro. Dipende dal tipo di lavoro aereo.
3000 ore di traino striscioni sinceramente portano poco o nulla, 3000 ore di istruzione hanno più valore. Per tentare di rendere chiaro quello che intendo dire, ti posto in un quote una parte presa dal sito americano JetCareers.
What matters more, experience or flight time?
"How closely do major airlines value prior part-121 and part-135 scheduled experience? Or was it just about the time in the logbook?"
Great question! total time is meaningless if not evaluated against background. Typical argument went something like this:
Three pilots applying for a job:
A) has 1350 Total Hours, all multi engine jet, 1150 as PIC
B) has 4500 hours Total Time, 3000 Hours Multi engine, with slightly less than 700 hours as PIC
C) has 7500 hours Total time, with 2500 Multi Engine, and 5000 hours PIC.
Now lets look at the applicants with further amplification:
A) was single seat USAF/USN/USMC Fighter Pilot. Subtract 200 Hours for pilot training the rest is all by him/her self. At an average of three hundred hours a year, that is almost four years of experience in high performance aircraft, in world wide service, all weather types with at least 30% a given of solid night, no moon flying. Oh by the way, takeoffs equals landings columns. Typically was a Flight Leader, and could have been an Instructor and or an Evaluator(APD).
Analysis - Strong Candidate Invite for Interview
B) Was civilian trained either post degree or in conjunction with a flight program at an aviation department equipped college. Solid basic aviation training foundation, and a Freight or Corporate accepted the individual with low time to fly in all types of weather. Gradual build up of multiengine recip time, enough to either upgrade at the Freight/Corporate job or enough to qualify for the Regionals. A couple of years at the Regionals flying multiengine turbo-props or even RJ's. Last 12 - 18 months flying as Captain either in Turbos or RJ's.
Analysis - Strong Candidate Invite for interview. Additional note: Strength is not only in flight time but quality of time. This individual has been flying a flight schedule for freight, corporate, and a regional. Has great weather/night experience and crew/pax experience.
C) Was civilian trained. Was trained but chose for whatever reason to take flight time building employment. A lot of power line,banner towing, and general nonscheduled flying. A lot of day VFR basic student CFI time. Most of the Multiengine time is moving a wide variety of aircraft across country for various "customers". The 5000 Hrs PIC is almost all in non-crew aircraft. Quality of weather and night time hard to distinguish. Maybe even occasional time in jets, but less than 100 hours of any one type aircraft, same for turboprops.
Analysis - Weak candidate, reject, not competitive with the average applicant.
So short answer to your question is yes, we looked hard at the backgrounds. Oh, we knew most of the 121 Carrier's cold and could find out about the type flying of the 135's fairly easy.
Detto ciò, l'Europa non è l'America, in Europa pagando purtroppo puoi tentare di giungere al traguardo prima.
Infine se vuoi fare l'istruttore solo per accumulare ore di volo, lascia stare, non vorrei mai un istruttore del genere. Fallo se ti piace, se pensi che possa divenira una carriera per te, ma se lo fai solo per accumulare ore di volo ripensaci almeno dieci volte.